Csicsmann v. Sallada’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 2614 (§ 104 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service Co. · Conkwright v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Rhoads v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he FMLA allows an employee who takes qualifying leave to be restored either to his original, pre-leave position or to an equivalent position with equivalent employment benefits, pay, and other terms and conditions of employment.” Csicsmann v. Sallada, 211 Fed.Appx. 163 , 166 (4th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted). 4 . Waag's complaint only asserted the termination claim as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is still a heavy burden for the plaintiff” and no material harm existed when plaintiff was reassigned upon returning from leave to a position less prestigious and with different responsibilities but in which the salary, job title, bonus eligibility, health care, and retirement benefits remained the same). 1 . It appears that, due to Plaintiff's change of jobs, the reorganization of the IRS, and the fact that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“one that is virtually identical to the employee’s former position in terms of pay, benefits, and working conditions, including privileges, perquisites, and status. It must involve the same or substantially similar duties and responsibilities, which must entail substantially equivalent skill, effort, responsibility, and authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.