Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

214 F.2d 281

Docket No. 12074.

Winkel v. Matthews

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued June 7, 1954.

Decided June 17, 1954

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1954-06-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1954

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1954-06-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Alvis Layne, Jr., Washington, D. C. appointed by this Court, with whom Mrs. Antonia H. Chayes, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

¶2Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Edward O. Fennell, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Before EDGERTON, FAHY, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This appeal is from an order discharging a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant is in custody under an extradition order. He contends he was held an unreasonably long time on a mere detainer before the requisition from Ohio, the demanding State, was received. The record does not clearly establish this contention. In any event the contention does not appear to have been made in the District Court, Certainly it was not made during the time when appellant was — allegedly—unreasonably held. We find no error affect-inS substantial rights,

¶6Affirmed.

/214/f2d/281 · .json · Public domain