Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

218 A.D.2d 639

Solomon v. Feldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1995-08-31

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2013

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-08-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered November 14, 1994, which granted a motion by certain defendants for partial summary judgment dismissing the first and second causes of action in the first amended complaint, and granted a cross motion by certain other defendants for summary judgment dismissing the first amended complaint as against them, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motions for summary judgment denied, with costs.

¶2Issues of fact are present as to when claims under Judiciary Law § 487 and for fraud accrued. Issues of fact are also present regarding an agency relationship (First Natl. Bank v Koriba, Inc., 89 AD2d 713). Further, issues exist concerning the remedies which would have been available to plaintiffs had they been aware of the true relationship between several of the defendants. All of the foregoing require a trial for their resolution. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ross, Asch and Tom, JJ.

/218/ad2d/639 · .json · Public domain