22 Ala. App. 105 - Yates v. State

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1978

10 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1The evidence for the state relative to the offense charged is:

¶2"The defendant struck at Noah Pace with a stick … each time he was on the outside of my picket fence and I was on the inside, out of his reach."

¶3And again:

¶4"When defendant hit at Noah Pace with a stick he was not standing close enough to hit him; in fact Noah was out of reach of him and that is why he did not hit him."

¶5An assault is an intentional attempt to strike, within striking distance, which fails of its intended effect either by preventive interference or by misadventure. Lane v. State,85 Ala. 11, 4 So. 730. The defendant's motion to exclude the evidence should have been granted.

¶6The foregoing being decisive of this appeal, other questions presented are not decided.

¶7The evidence for the state showing as it does that no crime has been committed, it could serve no good purpose to remand this *106 cause. An order therefore will here be entered discharging the defendant.

¶8Reversed and rendered.

¶9

On Rehearing. No motion to strike the bill of exceptions was made upon the original submission of this case, and under section 6434 of the Code of 1923, this court may not strike the bill of exceptions ex mero motu. The motion of the state to strike the bill of exceptions comes too late upon application for rehearing.

¶10Upon motion of the Attorney General the judgment of reversal is modified to this extent. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

¶11Opinion extended. Judgment modified, and application overruled.