Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 F.4th 871 - Laufer v. Looper

Laufer v. Looper’s Empirical Analysis

2022

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681E · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12181 (§ 301 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12182 (§ 302 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (§ 804 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3612 (§ 812 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman · Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins · Summers v. Earth Island Institute

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “bound by the Supreme Court's considered dicta almost as firmly as by the Court's outright holdings, particularly - 21 - information that she alleges Acheson didn't give her. And the statute makes that denial of information discrimination against disabled persons and gives Laufer the right to sue in response. That Laufer had no intent to use the information for anything but a lawsuit doesn't change things -- she was still injured in precisely the way the statute was designed to protect. c. i. Acheson's various attempts to distinguish Havens Realty don't change our view that it governs here. Acheson says that the denial of information here wasn't in itself discriminatory, but the lies to the plaintiff in Havens Realty were. Yes, the misinformation in Havens Realty certainly when . . . a dictum is of recent vintage and not enfeebled by any subsequent statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]here [wa]s no reason to doubt [the voters'] claim that the information would help them . . . evaluate candidates for public office,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “monitor [the organization's] workings and participate more effectively in the judicial selection process”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.