¶1*633Curia advisari vult.. December term, ISOS, judgment of non pros, was entered. See Woolley v. Cloutman, 1 Doug. 244; Wase v. Wyburd, Id. 246; Ailway v. Burrows, Id. 263; Wiltshire v. Lloyd, Id. 381, 382; Pitts v. Carpenter, 2 Strange, 1191.
22 F. Cas. 632
Smith v. Queen
U.S. District Court
Decided June 15, 1808
U.S. District Court · decided 1808-06-15
Debt [by Smitn, for the use of Higden, against Nicholas L. Queen], on a note under seal. There were payments proved which reduced the amount due to seventeen dollars and thirty cents. The verdict is, “We find .for the plaintiff and find the sum due on the note to be seventeen dollars and thirty cents.” moved for judgment of non pros., under Act Md. 1796, c. 68, § 9. The courts in Maryland are expressly limited. The jurisdiction of this court is general. See Act Cong.
Relies on President of the Michigan State Bank v. Hastings
Decided 1808-06-15