Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 Minn. 537

Tait v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 1876

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1876-04-11

Complaint for wilful trespass, in entering plaintiffs’ close and cutting and carrying away timber therefrom, to their damage in the sum of 1250.00, for which amount judgment is demanded. Defence, a general denial.

Relies on Livingston v. Platner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1876-04-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1984

5 state decisions

20187618801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gileillan, C. J.

¶1There are two ways in which the amoxmt to be recovered, under the statute allowing treble damages for certain trespasses, (Gen. St. ch. 75, § 28,) may be ascertained: first, the coxxrt may instruct the jury to assess the actual damage, and render their verdict for treble *538that amount; second, it may instruct the jury to return the-single damage, and the fact whether the trespass was wilful or involuntary; and the court may then treble the damage-so found. The facts upon which the question of treble damages depends must be passed upon by the jury, and not by the court. In this case it does not appear what instructions were given to the jury. Their verdict was general, and, the contrary not appearing, it is to be presumed that, after ascertaining the character of the trespass, they have allowed the damages to which the plaintiffs are by law entitled. Livingston v. Platner, 1 Cow. 175.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/22/minn/537 · .json · Public domain