¶1The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.
¶2For affirmance — Chief Justice Yandeebilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Jacobs and Beennan — 6.
¶3For reversal — None.
22 N.J. 83
Decided June 25, 1956
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1956-06-25
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1956-06-25
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1993
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.