Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

220 So. 3d 1273

Godfrey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2017-06-23

Relies on 593 So. 2d 211 - Sallas v. State · Hills v. State

Decided 2017-06-23

PER CURIAM.

¶1The order authorizing involuntary medical treatment is affirmed as the requirements of section 916.107(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2016), were proved by competent, substantial evidence. We note that order is not moot despite the fact that the 90-day period of treatment mandated by the order has expired. See Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1992), and Hills v. State, 699 So.2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

¶2AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
/220/so3d/1273 · .json · Public domain