Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

593 So. 2d 211

593 So.2d 211

17 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 27

Sallas v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 2, 1992

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1992-01-02

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-01-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of Woodruff (1997), Herman v. Herman (2000)

91 state decisions

450199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We have for review Sallas v. State, No. 90-1810 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 10, 1990) (unpublished order), which certified the same question of great public importance answered by this Court in Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211 (Fla.1992). The order below is quashed and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Godwin.

¶2It is so ordered.

OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur.BARKETT, J., concurs in result only.KOGAN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion, in which SHAW, C.J., and BARKETT, J., concur.
KOGAN,' Justice,

¶3concurring in part, dissenting in part.

¶4I concur that this opinion must be quashed and remanded. However, I would order the court below to apply the standard developed in my separate opinion in Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211 (Fla.1992) (Ko-gan, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part).

¶5SHAW, C.J., and BARKETT, J., concur.

/593/so2d/211 · .json · Public domain