Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

222 N.J. 33

In re Todd

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 21, 2015

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 2015-07-21

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)

Decided 2015-07-21

¶1CORRECTED ORDER

¶2FREDRICK TODD of MIAMI, FLORIDA, who was admitted to the bar of the State of California in 1979, having pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 and to Transacting in Criminal Proceeds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957;

¶3And the Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a formal complaint against respondent charging respondent with the knowing misappropriation of escrow funds, based on jurisdiction pursuant to RPC 8.5(a) (lawyer not admitted in this jurisdiction is subject to disciplinary authority if lawyer provides or offers to provide legal services in this jurisdiction);

¶4And FREDRICK TODD having tendered his consent to disbarment from the bar of the State of New Jersey and that act being tantamount to consenting to a permanent bar against his practice of law in New Jersey;

¶5And good cause appearing;

¶6It is ORDERED that FREDRICK TODD be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law in New Jersey, whether by plenary or limited license, or by admission pro hac vice, as a multijurisdictional practitioner, or as a foreign legal consultant, or in any other manner, effective immediately; and it is further

¶7ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s disciplinary record in this State; and it is further

¶8*34ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

/222/nj/33 · .json · Public domain