Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 F.2d 345 - Jones v. Hobby

Jones v. Hobby’s Empirical Analysis

223 F.2d 345 · 1955

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
June 1985
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1985

13 federal appellate ·

1301955196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ward v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did not directly or by implication modify or supersede the authority of the appropriate officials to demote [or remove] under procedures and regulations specifically applicable to personnel action of that character.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No officer or employee shall be rated unsatisfactory without a ninety-day prior warning and a reasonable opportunity to demonstrate satisfactory performance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.