¶1If the first and second assignments of error are to be entertained, they are dismissed on the opinion of the court below, discharging the rule to show cause why the transcript of the official stenographer’s notes of testimony should not be amended. The testimony which is the subject of the third and fourth assignments, though received in rebuttal, was properly commented upon in the charge. The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted to the court below for the purpose of execution.
225 Pa. 382
Commonwealth v. Leskoski
Decided June 22, 1909
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1909-06-22
Appeal, No. 160, Jan. T., 1909, by defendant from judgment of O. & T. Carbon Co., Oct. T., 1903, No. 1, on verdict .of guilty of murder of the first degree in case of Commonwealth v. Martin Leskoski. Indictment for murder.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1909-06-22
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1961
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →