Bailey v. State

Decided November 24, 1920

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1920-11-24

<p>Criminal law <&wkey;l094 — Judgment affirmed, in absence of bills of exception or statement ot tacts.</p> <p>Where the record shows no reason for reversal and no- reviewabie error, and there is no statement of facts or bills of exception, the judgment will be affirmed.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1927

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1920-11-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAVIDSON, P. J.

¶1Appellant was convicted of theft, and allotted ten years confinement in the penitentiary.

¶2The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, and, so far as the record is concerned, it presents no sufficient reason why the judgment should be reversed, and in fact presents no revisable error in the absence of the evidence and bills of exception.

¶3•. The judgment will be affirmed.

¶4<S=»For other oases see same topic and KEY-NTJMBER In all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes