Day v. Sebelius’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 8 U.S.C. § 1373 (§ 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1621 (§ 411 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1644 (§ 434 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996)
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Buckley v. Valeo · Roe v. Wade · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Sierra Club v. Morton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a matter of law, an order granting leave to intervene is non-dispositive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parson v. Farley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.