¶1CERTIORARI <&wkey;5-NATURE AND GROUNDS-EXISTENCE OF REMEDY BY APPEAL.
¶2Certiorari will not lie to review the action of a District Court or judge in granting or refusing an injunction, which, is reviewable by appeal.
¶3[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Certiorari, Cent. Dig. §§ 5, 6; Dec. Dig. <&wkey;5.]
¶4In the matter of the application of William H. Cogan for a writ of certiorari directed to the District Court of the United .States for the Southern District of New York.
¶5Application denied.
¶6Wm. H. Cogan, pro se.
¶7Before LACOMBE, COXE, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
¶9When a party considers himself aggrieved by the action of a District Court or of a District Judge in granting or refusing an injunction, he may review such action by appeal. See section 129, Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1134 [Comp. St. 1913, § 1121]). Certiorari to review will not lie.
¶10This certainly is not an appeal; indeed, the papers fail to indicate that suit in equity was ever brought. Apparently no process was ever served, and no bill of complaint was ever filed.
¶11Motion denied.