Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

229 So. 2d 17

Conner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 12, 1969

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1969-12-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1970

1 state decisions

Relies on 194 So. 2d 241 - State v. Barton · Brown v. State · 221 So. 2d 26 - Keehn v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1969-12-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal from an order denying appellant relief under CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence. The Assistant Public Defender was appointed to represent appellant immediately prior to trial. Appellant in his motion states that counsel did not have sufficient time to properly prepare for trial.

¶2The amount of time that elapsed between appointment and trial is not in and of itself sufficient to sustain a bare allegation that counsel was not appointed in time to properly represent the defendant. See State v. Barton, Fla.1967, 194 So.2d 241; Brown v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 191 So.2d 612; Keehn v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 221 So.2d 26.

¶3For the foregoing reasons the order denying relief sought under CrPR 1.850 is hereby affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
/229/so2d/17 · .json · Public domain