Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 A.3d 1050

Docket No. 393 MAL 2011.

Kem v. Pcs

K.E.M., Petitioner v. P.C.S., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 2011.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2011-07-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2012

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-07-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

ORDER

¶2PER CURIAM.

¶3AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, are:

1. Whether the Superior Court of Pennsylvania erred by affirming the lower court finding that paternity by estoppel applies in the present case and precludes the petitioner/plaintiff/mother from pursuing paternity or support against the respondent/putative father?
2. Whether the doctrine of paternity by estoppel, as applied in Pennsylvania, should be maintained, revised, or abrogated in its entirety?
/23/a3d/1050 · .json · Public domain