Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 Ala. App. 67 - Burge v. Forbes

23 Ala. App. 67 - Burge v. Forbes’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1981
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coleman v. Roberts · Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Robinson · 17 Ala. App. 606 - Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Barksdale · Mitchell v. Gambill · Bradley v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The intention to do immediate harm to the person of plaintiff appears not to be essential in an action for a civil assault”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.