Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 Ala. App. 73

120 So 917

Smith v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1929

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1929-03-19

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1937

2 state decisions

Relies on Hines v. Miniard · 21 Ala. App. 536 - Lovelady v. State · 21 Ala. App. 528 - Kimble v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-03-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SAMFORD, J.

¶1 Over objection and exception of defendant seasonably reserved, the court admitted a transcript of the testimony of Johnnie James given and taken down on the preliminary hearing of this case. The predicate laid for the introduction of this evidence was as follows:

¶2 “Q. Where is he (Johnnie James) at this time? Ans. Pine Bluff,.Ark.

¶3 “Q. How long has he been there? Ans. Probably four or five months.”

¶4 No subpoena had been issued for Johnnie James, nor was there other evidence on this subject. The predicate laid was not sufficient. Hines v. Miniard, 208 Ala. 176, 94 So. 302; Kimble v. State, 21 Ala. App. 528, 109 So. 610.

¶5 Charges refused were covered by the court in his general charge or in other given charges.

¶6 Other rulings of the court were free from error.

¶7 For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

¶8 Reversed and remanded.

/23/alaapp/73 · .json · Public domain