Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 F.3d 401

Docket No. 94-6167.

Hayward v. Mills

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994. Decided: May 20, 1994.

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union of United Food and Commercial Workers International Union · In Re Aaron Holsey

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-05-20

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-18-N)

Ronald Hayward, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order which denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint without prejudice. Because Appellant could cure the defects in his complaint through amendment, the order dismissing his complaint is not appealable. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

Furthermore, Appellant's motion for injunctive relief to facilitate this appeal is dismissed as moot

/23/f3d/401 · .json · Public domain