Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 F.3d 401

Docket No. 93-8081.

In Re Aaron Holsey

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994. Decided April 4, 1994.

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 1995 · most notably Hughes v. Bedsole (1995), L. Shirley Harvey v. Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Commonwealth of Virginia (1994)

32 federal appellate ·

Relies on In re Beard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-04-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Aaron Holsey, petitioner pro se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Aaron Holsey petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to reassign his cases in the District of Maryland to another district judge. Holsey has failed to show any bias on the part of the district judge that would warrant recusal. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827-32 (4th Cir.1987). Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the Court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

¶2

PETITION DENIED.

/23/f3d/401 · .json · Public domain