Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 F.2d 163 - Burrell v. Fahs

Burrell v. Fahs’s Empirical Analysis

232 F.2d 163 · 1956

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
September 1992
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 1992

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

7019561960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co. · Watson v. Commissioner · Rosenberg v. United States · Carmack v. Scofield · United States v. Pierotti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Requirement that claim be filed. (1) Credits or refunds of overpayments may not be allowed or made after the expiration of the statutory period of limitation properly applicable unless, before the expiration of such period, a claim therefor has been filed by the taxpayer. Furthermore, under section 7422, a civil action for refund may not be instituted unless a claim has been filed within the properly applicable period of limitation. “ (2) The claim, together with appropriate supporting evidence, must be filed in the office of the district director for the internal revenue district in which the tax was paid. * * *. “(b) Grounds set forth in claim. (1) No refund or credit will be allowed after the expiration of the statutory period of limitation applicable to the filing of a claim therefor except upon one or more of the grounds set forth in a claim filed before the expiration of such period. The claim must set forth in detail each ground upon which a credit or refund is claimed and facts sufficient to apprise the Commissioner of the exact basis thereof. The statement of the grounds and facts must be verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury. A claim which does not comply with this paragraph will not be considered for any purpose as a claim for refund or credit. *( sj: tj: “(c) Form for filing claim. Claims by the taxpayer for the refunding of overpayment of taxes, interest, penalties, and additions to tax shall be made on Form 843. * ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(a) No suit prior to filing claim for refund. — -No suit or proceeding shall be maintained in any court for the recovery of any internal revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected, or of any penalty claimed to have been collected without authority, or of any sum alleged to have been excessive or in any manner wrongfully collected, until a claim for refund or credit has been duly filed with the Secretary or his delegate, according to the provisions of law in that regard, and the regulations of the Secretary or his delegate established in pursuance thereof.” The 1939 Code, Int.Rev.Code of 1939, § 3772(a) (1), 53 Stat. 465 , contained a like requirement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.