Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

345 U.S. 1003

Rosenberg v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1953-06-15

Relies on Darr v. Burford · Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. · Julius Rosenberg and Ethel Rosenberg v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1953-06-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1991 · most notably Terry v. Adams (1953), Rosenberg v. United States (1953)

56 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

55019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ante, p. 965. Petition for rehearing denied. Mr. Justice Frankfurter deems it appropriate to state once more that the reasons that preclude publication by the Court, as a general practice, of votes on petition for certiorari guide him *1004in all cases, so that it has been his “unbroken practice not to note dissent from the Court’s disposition of petitions for certiorari.” Chemical Bank Co. v. Investors, 343 U. S. 982; Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc., 338 U. S. 912; Darr v. Burford, 339 U. S. 200, 227; Agoston v. Pennsylvania, 340 U. S. 844; Bondholders, Inc. v. Powell, 342 U. S. 921; Rosenberg v. United States, 344 U. S. 889, 345 U. S. 965. Partial disclosure of votes on successive stages of a certiorari proceeding does not present an accurate picture of what took place. Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion the petition for rehearing should be granted.

/345/us/1003 · .json · Public domain