Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

232 N.J. 88

178 A.3d 62

State v. Chisum

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 26, 2018

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 2018-01-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2019

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“limited to the issues of whether the police were authorized to detain the defendants and to conduct pat-down searches for weapons.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. Chisum

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2018-01-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

¶2A petition for certification of the judgment in A-5305/5603-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

¶3It is ORDERED that the petitions for certification are granted limited to the issues of whether the police were authorized to detain the defendants and to conduct pat-down searches for weapons; and it is further

¶4ORDERED that the appellants may serve and file a supplemental brief on or before March 27, 2018, and respondent may serve and file a supplemental brief forty-five (45) days after the filing of the appellants' supplemental submission, or, if appellants decline to file such a submission, on or before May 11, 2018.

/232/nj/88 · .json · Public domain