235 Md. App. 287 - Harding v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Bradshaw v. Stumpf · Douglas v. State · State v. Thomas · Marshall v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. That cautionary language strongly implies that if this Court places a condition or limitation on the grant of an application for leave to appeal, as it did in the order granting the application in this case, the condition or limitation ordinarily should be treated as binding. 1 Moultrie asserts that Harding 's cautionary language should not dictate the resolution of this case because, he says, it is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[f]urther proceedings ... shall be conducted ... as if the order granting leave to appeal were a notice of appeal filed pursuant to Rule 8-202.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.