In re Cal. E.’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1901 (§ 2 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1902 (§ 3 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1903 (§ 4 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1911 (§ 101 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1912 (§ 102 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1914 (§ 104 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978)
Relies on Batterton v. Francis · 196 Ill. 2d 181 - In Re CN · 199 Ill. 2d 309 - Wickham v. Byrne · 194 Ill. App. 3d 31 - In Re Armell · 165 Ill. 2d 100 - Brewer v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.