Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

235 N.J. 481

197 A.3d 86

In re Speck

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 8, 2018

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 2018-11-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2019

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2018-11-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-336, concluding that Michael R. Speck of Freehold, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(d), Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

¶2And Michael R. Speck having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

¶3And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that respondent's conduct violated RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6, and that there is not clear and convincing evidence of violation of RPC 8.4(c) ;

¶4And good cause appearing;

¶5It is ORDERED that Michael R. Speck is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

¶6ORDERED that the charge of violation of RPC 8.4(c) is hereby dismissed; and it is further

¶7ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

¶8ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

/235/nj/481 · .json · Public domain