Aiken v. Nixon’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 10801 (Protection and Advocacy for Mentally Ill Individuals Act of 1986) · 42 U.S.C. § 10805 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Katz v. United States · Anderson v. Creighton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.