236 Md. App. 636 - Holmes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2021
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Illinois · Holmes v. South Carolina · In Re Yve S. · State v. Ware · Ricks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he clear purpose of the Maryland Wiretap Act is to prohibit secret recordings of private oral communications, without regard to which device may be used to accomplish that task.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Agnew v. State“presumptive violation of Maryland's wiretap law”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Agnew v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.