Dolgner v. Alander’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
240 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 240 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Cadlerock Properties Joint Venture, L.P. v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection (2000), Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Truelove & MacLean, Inc. (1996)
240 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care · Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control · Spierings v. Alaska · City of New Haven v. Freedom of Information Commission · Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. Carothers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 240 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is something less than the weight of the evidence, and the possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency's finding from being supported by substantial evidence.”
68 later decisions quote this exact passage“(t)he court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact. . . . The court shall affirm the decision of the agency unless the court finds that substantial rights of the person appealing have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are . . . clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record.”
19 later decisions quote this exact passage“A person who has exhausted all administrative remedies available within the agency and who is aggrieved by a final decision may appeal to the superior court as provided in this section.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.