239 F. Supp. 699 - Broomer v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2001
7 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 402 · 29 U.S.C. § 411 · 29 U.S.C. § 412 · 29 U.S.C. § 414 · 29 U.S.C. § 415 · 29 U.S.C. § 431 · 29 U.S.C. § 481 · 29 U.S.C. § 482
Relies on Calhoon v. Harvey · Nicholas Mamula v. United Steelworkers of America, an Unincorporated Labor Union, and I. W. Abel, International Secretary-Treasurer Thereof · 211 F. Supp. 315 - Forline v. Helpers Local No. 42 · Almeida Bus Lines, Inc. v. Curran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It shall be the duty of the secretary or corresponding principal officer of each labor organization, in the case of a local labor organization, to forward a copy of each collective bargaining agreement made by such labor organization with any employer to any employee who requests such a copy and whose rights as such employee are directly affected by such agreement, and in the case of a labor organization other than a local labor organization, to forward a copy of any such agreement to each constituent unit which has members directly affected by such agreement; and such officer shall maintain at the principal office of the labor organization of which he is an officer copies of any such agreement made or received by such labor organization, which copies shall be available for inspection by any member or by any employee whose rights are affected by such agreement. The provisions of section 210 [ 29 U.S.C. § 440 ] shall be applicable in the enforcement of this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`no reason to conclude that the officers of the Local will not accede to a request that they comply with the law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.