Clouser v. Mock’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably Baromich v. State (1969), 151 Ind. App. 380 - Wadkins v. Thornton (1972)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Charles Sibbald v. The United States · Cameron v. M'Roberts · Perkins v. Hayward · Dawson v. Wright, Mayor, Etc. · Livingston v. Livingston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . that during term at which a judgment is rendered, the court has very broad powers on its . own motion or upon that of any parties'to modify, set aside or vacate its judgment. [Cases cited]” Clouser et al. v. Mock et al. (1959), 239 Ind. 143 , 155 N. E. 2d 745 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““During the time a court has jurisdiction of the parties in proceeding, they must keep themselves informed of the steps taken in the case and are bound by the court’s action therein without special or additional notice.” Clouser et al. v. Mock et al. (1959), 239 Ind. 143 , 155 N. E. 2d 745, 747 ; Flanders v. Ostrom, Rec. (1933), 206 Ind. 87 , 187 N. E. 673 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ ... To permit such procedure without time limits would place no finality on judgments; never settle or end litigation, and leave judgments in such uncertainty that no one could rely upon them or proceed with any assurance they would not be changed at any time.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.