Frank S. Hogan, pro se.
Michael R. Juviler, for appellee Hogan.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, pro se.
Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Maria L. Marcus, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee Lefkowitz.
PER CURIAM.
396 U.S. 11
Supreme Court of the United States
October 13, 1969
Supreme Court of the United States · decided October 13, 1969
Relies on Shapiro v. Solman
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided October 13, 1969
Cited by 30 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2022 · most notably Richardson v. Ramirez (1974), 9 Cal. 3d 199 - Ramirez v. Brown (1973)
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
Frank S. Hogan, pro se.
Michael R. Juviler, for appellee Hogan.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, pro se.
Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Maria L. Marcus, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee Lefkowitz.
PER CURIAM.