24 So. 3d 556 - Ware v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““examine the record and conclude that ‘oral findings, if recorded or transcribed, can satisfy the requirements of Morrissey [v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972),] when those findings create a record sufficiently complete to advise the parties and the reviewing court of the reasons for the revocation of supervised release and the evidence the decision maker relied upon.’ [United States v.] Copeland, 20 F.3d [412, 414 (11th Cir.1994) ].””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Dennis v. State

2. ““ ‘In this case, the revocation hearing was not transcribed. Also, the written revocation order does not include any facts regarding the volun-tariness of the [defendant's admission. Therefore, we cannot properly review the [defendant’s claim regarding the voluntariness of his admission. Accordingly, we must reverse the circuit court’s judgment revoking the [defendant’s probation and remand this case for the circuit court to conduct a new revocation hearing.’ ””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Dennis v. State