Croll v. McCullough

Decided November 7, 1913

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1913-11-07

Appeal, No. 2, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Armstrong Co., Dec. T., 1910, No. 210, on verdict for plaintiff in case of L. B. Croll and Alex. Montgomery v. James McCullough, Jr. Assumpsit to recover commissions on the sale of real estate. Before Williams, P. J. The facts appear ¡by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Verdict for plaintiff for $3,175.75 and judgment thereon. .Defendant appealed.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1962

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1913-11-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Cubiam,

¶1This action was to recover on a contract for commissions for the sale of real estate. Neither the making of the contract nor the hams thereof were in dispute, but it was contended by the defendant that a purchaser had not been procured within the time specified by the contract, who in good faith had offered to buy the real estate and who was financially able to do so. The questions raised by this contention were questions of fact for the jury, and we find no error in the manner in which they were submitted.

¶2The judgment is affirmed.