Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 F.2d 432 - Lowe v. Jacobs

Lowe v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis

243 F.2d 432 · 1957

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
9
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably George G. Allman v. W. H. Hanley (1962), Maseda v. Honda Motor Co. (1988)

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 13 state decisions

1001957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Relies on 91 Ga. App. 571 - Allen v. Hatchett · Hopson v. North American Ins. Co. · Bean v. Clark · 90 So. 2d 884 - State Ex Rel. Gremillion v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCMENT OF CP

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “28 U.S.C.A. § 1446 . “(a) A defendant or defendants desiring to remove any civil action or criminal prosecution from a State court shall file in the district court of the United States for the district and division within which such action is pending a verified petition containing a short and plain statement of the facts which entitle him or them to removal together with a copy of all process, pleadings and orders served upon him or them in such action.” * * * “(d) Each petition for removal of a civil action or proceeding, except a petition in behalf of the United States, shall be accompanied by a bond with good and sufficient surety conditioned that the defendant or defendants will pay all costs and disbursements incurred by reason of the removal proceeding should it be determined that the case was not removable or was improperly removed. “(e) Promptly after the filing of such petition and bond the defendant or defendants shall give written notice thereof to all adverse parties and shall file a copy of the petition with the clerk of such State court, which shall effect the removal and the State court shall proceed no further unless and until the case is remanded." (Emphasis supplied.) 28 U.S.C.A. § 1447 . “ * * * “(c) If at any time before final judgment it appears that the case was removed improvidently and without jurisdiction, the district court shall remand the case, and may order the payment of just costs. A certified copy of the order of remand shall be mailed by its c”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.