Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 N.C. 28 - State v. Stonestreet

State v. Stonestreet’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably State v. Cameron (1973), State v. Greenlee (1968)

39 state decisions

100195519601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Greer · State v. Cole · State v. Camel · State v. Braxton · State v. Thorne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where two or more indictments or counts are consolidated for the purpose of judgment, and a single judgment is pronounced thereon, even though the plea of guilty or conviction on one is sufficient to support the judgment and the trial thereon is free from error, the award of a new trial on the other indictment (s) or count (s) requires that the cause be remanded for proper judgment on the valid count. 'Presumably this (the single judgment) was based upon consideration of guilt on both charges.’ Devin, J., later C.J., in S. v. Camel, 230 N.C. 426 , 53 S.E. 2d 313 ; also, see S. v. Braxton, 230 N.C. 312 , 52 S.E. 2d 895 . But the rule is otherwise when, as here, separate judgments, each complete within itself, are pronounced on separate indictments or counts. In such case, a valid judgment pronounced on a plea of guilty to a valid count in a bill of indictment will be upheld. N v. Thorne, supra; S. v. Calcutt, 219 N.C. 545 , 15 S.E. 2d 9 .””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.