Volume 244 — North Eastern Reporter, Third Series

FELONIOUS ASSAULT – R.C. 2901.11(A)(1) – INTENT – KNOWINGLY – R.C. 2901.22(B) – EXPERT TESTIMONY – CREDIBILITY: Defendant's conviction for felonious assault is supported by sufficient evidence because a rational trier of fact could find that defendant's testimony describing her decision to drive across the parking lot and surveillance footage showing defendant striking the victim with her car established that defendant acted knowingly. Defendant's conviction for felonious assault is not against the manifest weight of the evidence because although defendant presented expert testimony that she had operated her vehicle as a flight reaction to an attack, the trial court was entitled to find that expert testimony not credible and undermined by surveillance footage in the record.

Standing housing code violations terms and conditions of community control separate and distinct legal entities. Appellant had standing to challenge housing court's order on appeal only to the extent that the order injuriously affected appellant, not to assert the rights of third parties. Housing court erred and abused its discretion to the extent that it imposed restrictions or requirements relating to properties owned by other entities as a term or condition of appellant's community control.

Retail installment sales contract motion for judgment on the pleadings Civ.R. 12(C) R.C. 1307.01 statute of limitations Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.