Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

246 A.2d 641

Grayson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1968

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 1968-10-24

Relies on Tibbs v. Tibbs · McRae v. United States · State v. Morton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1968-10-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2009

6 state decisions

3019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant, with only six dollars in cash on his person, entered a self-service grocery store and placed various meats priced at $21.51 in a bag. Carrying the bag, he walked past several check-out stands, stood for a few minutes near the exit door, and then walked out of the store. He was arrested outside and charged with petit larceny.

¶2At trial appellant testified he intended to pay for the meat and he gave an explanation of how he intended to make payment and why he left the store without paying. The trial court found appellant’s testimony unconvincing and adjudged him guilty.

¶3In this court appellant first argues that he was entitled to an acquittal because of lack of evidence of any criminal intent in taking the goods. We think there was ample evidence from which the trial court could conclude that appellant possessed the intent necessary to support a finding of guilt.1 We find no merit in appellant’s other claim of error.

¶4Affirmed.

¶5. McRae v. United States, D.C.App., 222 A.2d 848 (1966); Groomes v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 155 A.2d 73 (1959). See also State v. Morton, 4 Conn.Cir. 681, 238 A.2d 814 (1967).

/246/a2d/641 · .json · Public domain