In Re Westbrook’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1324 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1327 · 11 U.S.C. § 1330 · 11 U.S.C. § 506
Relies on Baltimore Co v. Phillips · Oklahoma v. New Mexico · Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd. · Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd. · In re Szostek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) the holder of such claim has accepted the plan; (B)(i) the plan provides that the holder of such claim retains a hen securing such claim; and (ii) the value, as of the effective date of the plan, of property to be distributed under the plan on account of such claim is not less than the allowed amount of such claim; or (C) the debtor surrenders the property securing such claim to such holder;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.