Denison v. Udall’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1996
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 22 · 30 U.S.C. § 611 · 5 U.S.C. § 1009
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co. · Chrisman v. Miller · Everett Foster v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the Interior · Adams v. Witmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there should be no de novo review by this Court, but a determination that the final administrative decision is or is not substantially supported by the administrative record. Therefore, a summary judgment pursuant to [Fed. R.Civ.P. 56] may be granted for either party in response to their cross motions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.