¶1The opinion of the Court was delivered by
¶2Where there have been mutual accounts between two persons within six years, the statute of limitations does not apply to any part of either account.
¶3It makes no difference that both accounts were kept by one of the parties. It is, perhaps, doubtful whether it is necessary that the accounts should be kept in writing at all.
¶4When one has an account against another, the whole or a part of which is older than six years, he cannot take it all out of the statute by merely entering a credit. The credit, to have that effect, must be authenticated and proved to have been intended as a payment on the account.
¶5This was a suit for a balance on book account. The plaintiff’s book showed several credits within six years, and it was proved, moreover, that the items of credit were delivered on account, and credited agreeably to the defendant’s request. The parties must settle as if the statute of limitations had never been passed.
¶6Judgment reversed and venire facias de novo awarded.