Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 NW2D 239 - State v. Rogers

State v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2019

24 state decisions

8019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3651

Relies on Burns v. United States · Fuller v. Oregon · James v. Strange · 12 Cal. 3d 20 - People v. Amor · 71 Cal. 2d 388 - In Re Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The requirement of repayment is imposed only on a convicted defendant. (2) The court does not order payment of this expense unless the convicted person is or will be able to pay it without undue hardship to himself or dependents, considering the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden payment will impose. (3) Revocation of probation shall occur only if defendant willfully fails to make payment, having financial ability to do so. (4) Defendant may petition sentencing court to adjust the amount of any installment payments, or the total amount due, to fit a changing financial condition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Conditions of probation. The court, in ordering probation, may impose any reasonable rules and conditions which will promote rehabilitation of the defendant and protection of the community....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If a court finds that a person desires legal assistance, and is financially able to secure counsel but refuses to employ an attorney, the court shall appoint an attorney to represent such person at public expense. The attorney fee paid by the state or county in such cases shall be taxed as part of the court costs against the person receiving the legal assistance, and the state or county shall be reimbursed for said fee when the court costs are paid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.