State v. Nguyen’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
77 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably State v. Ceballos (2003), State v. Perkins (2004)
77 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Geders v. United States · National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services · Hiatt v. Indiana State Student Assistance Commission · Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“every reasonable presumption in favor of the trial court's discretionary ruling will be made.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In the past, we have recognized that the trial court has broad discretion to determine the form and scope of the proper response to allegations of ... misconduct. See State v. Ross, [ 230 Conn. 183, 228 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995)]; State v. Rodriguez, [ 210 Conn. 315, 326 , 554 A.2d 1080 (1989)]; State v. Asherman, [ 193 Conn. 695, 735 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1749 , 84 L.Ed.2d 814 (1985)]. State v. Brown, [ 235 Conn. 502, 523-24 , 668 A.2d 1288 (1995)]. In Brown , for example, we exercised our supervisory authority over the administration of justice to hold that... a trial court must conduct a preliminary inquiry, on the record, whenever it is presented with any allegations of jury misconduct in a criminal case, regardless of whether an inquiry is requested by counsel.... We [emphasized however] that the trial court has broad discretion to determine the form and scope of the proper response to allegations of jury misconduct.... Our role as an appellate court is limited ... to a consideration of whether the trial court's review of alleged jury misconduct can fairly be characterized as an abuse of its discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Michael J.“defense counsel's ultimate characterization of events was not necessarily inconsistent with the prosecutor's assertions.... Rather, defense counsel's own representations corroborated that a conversation in fact had taken place between himself and the defendant's wife while [the witness] was present, and that the exchange had related, in some respect, to the testimony previously given by the defendant's wife. In light of this corroboration, the prosecutor's allegations stood effectively uncontested.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Michael J.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.