Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

254 F. 225

Docket Nos. 2621-2624.

Ex parte Tinkoff

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1918.)

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1918-06-11

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois; Kenesaw M. Dandis, Judge.</p> <p>From orders (254 Fed. 222) denying wilts of habeas corpus to Paysoff Tinkoff, Steve Zozaski, Hugo Carlson, and Victor Zukowski, petitioners separately appeal.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1928

3 counsel of record

Relies on Ex parte Tinkoff

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1918-06-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois; Kenesaw M. Dandis, Judge.

¶2From orders (254 Fed. 222) denying wilts of habeas corpus to Paysoff Tinkoff, Steve Zozaski, Hugo Carlson, and Victor Zukowski, petitioners separately appeal.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4Pay soil: Tinkoff and Stedman & Soelke, all of Chicago, Ill. (Swan M. Johnson, of Chicago, 111., of counsel), for appellant Tinkoff.

¶5Stedman Soelke, of Chicago, Ill. (Swan M. Johnson, of Chicago, Ill. of counsel), for appellants Zozaski, Carlson, and Zukowski.

¶6Charles F. Clyne, U. S. Atty., Robert T. Neill, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., and Dieut. Col. Naihan William MaeChesney, Judge Advocate, U. S. Army, all of Chicago, Ill. (Dieut. Col. Nathan William MaeChesney and Deslíe M. O’Connor, Department Judge Advocate’s Office, Central Department, U. S. Army, both of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellees.

¶7Before BAKER, ADSCHUDER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

¶8PER CURIAM.

¶9The orders heretofore entered by the District Court in these cases, refusing to issue writs of habeas corpus for discharge from military service of the United States under Selective Service Daw May 18, 1917, c. 15, 40 Stat. 76, will be affirmed^ as the petitions do not set forth facts justifying their issuance.

/254/f1d/225 · .json · Public domain