Panama R. v. Robert

Decided March 24, 1919.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1919-03-24

<p>In Error to the District Court of the Canal Zone; Wm. H. Jackson, Judge.</p> <p>Action by Evelina Robert against the Panama Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.</p>

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 1939

8 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Panama R. v. Curran

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1919-03-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the District Court of the Canal Zone; Wm. H. Jackson, Judge.

¶2Action by Evelina Robert against the Panama Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4Frank Feuille, of Ancon, O. Z., and Walter F. Van Dame, of Balboa Heights, C. Z., for plaintiff in error.

¶5Stevens Ganson, of Panama, R. P., for defendant in error.

¶6Before PARDEE, WALKER, and BATTS, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8So far as the questions presented for decision are concerned, there is no material difference between this case and the case of Panama Railroad Co. v. Curran (U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, present term) 256 Fed. 768, - C. C. A. —. Following that decision, the judgment in this case is affirmed.