¶1The judgment in this case is affirmed, on the following from the opinion of the learned court below directing it to be entered: “The license tax in suit has not been assessed upon sales made by a dealer in Pennsylvania to purchasers in foreign countries. It is not a tax or burden upon foreign commerce and a regulation of foreign commerce, as appears from the cases referred to; and the question is controlled by th.e decisions in this State of Knisley v. Cotterel, 196 Pa. 614, and of the other Pennsylvania cases referred to since the date of that decision.”
256 Pa. 508
Commonwealth v. Crew Levick Co.
Decided February 19, 1917
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1917-02-19
Appeal, No. 206, Jan. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1914, No. 5454, on case stated in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Crew Levick Co. Appeal from assessment of mercantile appraisers.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1917
Relies on Knisely v. Cotterel
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1917-02-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →