256 Pa. 615
Decided February 26, 1917
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1917-02-26
Appeal, No. 331, Jan. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1912, No. 5505, on bill in equity for the dissolution of a partnership in case of Patrick Clearkin v. Dominick Taheny. Bill in equity for the dissolution of partnership and for an accounting.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1922
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1917-02-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1By the decree of the court below the appellant is fully protected against all claims, suits, actions and demands of the unpaid creditors of the partnership. Under the facts properly found by the learned referee he has no further interest in the assets of the same, and the proper decree was that the ownership and title to the properties involved should be vested absolutely in the appellee.
¶2Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.