257 U.S. 613
Docket No. 44.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1921-11-07
<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.</p>
Cited by 3 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1981
1 federal appellate ·
2 counsel of record
Relies on Brolan v. United States · Sugarman v. United States
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1921-11-07
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.
¶2Mr. Hannis Taylor for appellant.
¶3Mr. William C. Herron with whom Mr. Assistant Attorney General Stewart and Mr. H. S. Bidgely were on the brief, for appellees.
¶5Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 217-218; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 185.